Oil and Gas
Oil and Gas | Geophysics and Seismic Interpretation
Hydraulic Fracture Monitoring using the Microseismic Technique
The course aims to give attendees firstly a knowledge of the theory and practicality of microseismic monitoring and secondly an understanding of the problems to avoid and the methods that promote success. It will cover the essential geophysics and engineering aspects of this technology and provide information to promote best practice when contracting for a microseismic monitoring service/installation.
Feedback
Schedule
Duration and Training Method
A three-day classroom course. Discussions of case histories and exercises augment lectures. Each attendee will have access to a PC supplied with a VM containing visualization and processing software.
Course Overview
Learning Outcomes
Participants will learn to:
- Investigate the basics of microseismic event location.
- Assess what drives location precision, accuracy and error (learn about the semantic and operational ambiguity of uncertainty).
- Judge the importance of the velocity model in terms of error, (in)appropriateness and calibration.
- Discern the difference between inversion and imaging methods and the practicalities of surface and downhole methods.
- Assess the history of this technology, its development and the direction it is now taking.
- Evaluate a microseismic service report, gauge the quality of the raw data, the quality of the results and query the analytical strength of the conclusions.
- Select best practices when contracting for microseismic services.
Course Content
The recording and analysis of microseismic activity is a technique that allows us to observe stress changes taking place in a reservoir in both space and time and to use this information to relate the rheology of the sub-surface geology to fluid movement and pressure change. The course will cover the geophysical basis to event location, the importance of network design in understanding resolution, accuracy and artefact. A discussion on the impact of picking accuracy, velocity model accuracy will help to dispel some of the myths associated with hypocentral mis-location.
The content of this course should provide enough information to promote best practice when contracting for a microseismic monitoring service/installation and to guide any interested participant to find more advanced information on this topic.
Introduction and overview
1. Introduction
2. Historical context
- Technology development and transfer of technology to oil and gas industry
- Development within oil and gas industry
3. Why monitor microseismic activity?
- Geomechanical change in sub-surface
- Applications:
i. HFM: Geometry, infill
ii. Production: fault reactivation, compartmentalisation
iii. Cap rock integrity
Some fundamentals of Seismology
4. Earthquake seismology and geomechanics
- Type of Faults/Failure
- Intro to Source mechanisms
i. Focal mechanism, moment tensors - Source parameters
i. Stress drop, fault radius, moment, magnitude - B-values
- Mohr circle failure criterion
Microseismic Data Collection
5. Data
- Source signal
i. Bandwidth, Size, Directionality - Transmission
i. Effect of rheology of sub-surface and well completion - Tool/system response
i. Resonance, noise, sensitivity, coupling
ii. Surface recording techniques and borehole tools
iii. Tool/system limitations: sample rate, resolution - External influences
i. Noise sources, tool movement, - Practical effects of these issues
i. Network design and geometry on location - ii. Use of perf, sliding sleeve, jet pack, coil tubing, etc.
- iii. Recording distance, noise, well conditions
- iv. On pad vs off pad recording on noise conditions
Technology applications and discussions
6. Interpretation
- Coping with inaccuracy and uncertainty
i. Recording geometry issues, known velocity, formation issues - Complicated wavefields
Case histories summaries and Workshop session
7. How to QC a Microseismic Monitoring job
- Signal to Noise
- Error Estimates
- Common processing issues and how to identify them.
8. Case histories
- Cap Rock
- Tight Gas Sands, fluvial
- Tight Gas Shale
- Fault reactivation
- EOR operations
- “Other” Data integration examples
i. Surface/downhole and Imaging/Inversion
ii. Tilt, microseismic
9. Workshop session: Exploration and clarification of common misunderstandings and answers to questions arising during the course
- Why do tensile fracs generate shear events?
- Why straddle the perf?
- Does a larger pumped volume mean more events?
- How accurate is a good location?
- How uncertain is a bad location?
- What does aseismic mean?
- Why is tensile failure so quiet?
10. Summary
- New developments in microseismic
i. Surface microseismic
ii. Migration, semblance methods, etc. - Looking forward with microseismic monitoring technology
- Technology gaps
- Synergy with other techniques
- Digital oilfield
11. Hands-on Microseismic Processing Session
The purpose of this part of the class is to familiarize the attendee with microseismic waveform data, microseismic image volumes and the effects of stacking/picking and velocity models on the locations.
Data Example
- Review project geometry
i. Receiver geometry and horizontal orientation - Analysis of Event Waveforms
i. Source stack
ii. Receiver stack
iii. Filtering
iv. Picking P and S waves - Velocity model considerations
- Effects of picking
- Effects of velocity model
Who Should Attend and Prerequisites
This course has been designed for both geophysicists and engineers who wish to develop a sound general understanding of this technology and fill in a few technical gaps.
Instructors
Stephen Wilson
Background
Stephen is a key member of a small group of pioneers responsible for the development and application of microseismic technology in the oil and gas business. During his 20 year career Stephen has demonstrated the strategic focus, judgment and technical understanding necessary to carry out and direct research, market the product, improve profitability and grow a new business from startup to private sale.
Presently Stephen runs his own consulting company focused on education and innovation. Previously, in 2012, Stephen sold his company, RockTalk Imaging Corp, to Halliburton and took on the responsibility for the management and growth of their new microseismic imaging business within Halliburton/Pinnacle. Before that, Stephen managed Magnitude SAS, part of the CGG/Baker Joint Venture entity VSfusion, and worked for Schlumberger Cambridge Research in the UK and Schlumberger Technical Services in the USA and France.
Prior to this time in managerial roles, Stephen spent 10 years in various technical roles, working in the UK for ABB/Vetco Gray on various oil and gas/geothermal microseismic monitoring programmes including those at Ekofisk, Valhall, Yibal and Qarn Alam plus various projects in the USA and overseas.
Affiliations and Accreditation
Phd University of Liverpool - Microseismic Monitoring of Unstable Slopes
MSc University of Sunderland - Scientific Computing
BSc Swansea University - Earth Sciences
SEG - Member
SPE - Member
EAGE - Member
Courses Taught
N344:Hydraulic Fracture Monitoring using the Microseismic Technique